HS Combination.

The modern theory.

The different HS combinations and transformation.

·        Jia + Ji to earth

·        Bing + Xin to water

·        Wu + Gui  to fire

·        Geng + Yi  to metal

·        Ren + Ding  to wood

The transformation is supposed to only happens under certain situation.

One of the conditions for transformation is support from the Month EB.

Example

….X….X….Bing….Xin

….X….X…..Hai…...X

The Bing Xin have transformed to water and is now considered as water.

The new chart.

….X….X….Gui….Gui

….X….X…..Hai…...X

If the Month controls the transformation element, the transformation will not be successful.

Example

….X….X….Bing….Xin

….X….X…..Wu…...X

The Bing Xin combination will not transform due to the Wu fire month.

Is this the correct way to read a chart?

ZPZQ method.

甲用丙食 与辛作合，

For Jia DM, Bing is the Eating God and is combined with Xin.

而非其食,

It is no longer considered as Eating God.

…..X…..Jia…..Bing…..Xin

Both Bing Eating God and Xin Direct Officer have lost their 10 God’s association.

又如甲逢庚为煞 ，与乙作合，

For Jia DM, Geng is the 7Killing and is combined with Yi.

而煞不攻身；

The 7K is no longer attacking the DM.

…..X…..Jia…..Geng…..Yi

With the Yi Geng combination, both of them have lost their 10 god’s association.

Case Study.

Bill Gates.

 

 

 

 

 

 

During Xin Si LP, there is a Bing Xin combination.

What is the correct way to read the chart?

Do we consider it as a combination with no transformation?

Or do we consider the Bing In-Direct Wealth has been removed?

The Bing In-Direct Wealth is the Yong Shen of the chart.

The removal of the Yong Shen would affect the chart greatly.

Oprah Winfrey.

 

 

 

 

 

 

During Wu Chen LP, there is a Wu Gui combination.

What is the correct way to read the chart?

Do we consider it as a combination with no transformation?

Or do we consider the Gui In-Direct Resource has been removed?

Comment by others:

There are some who says not to refer to the classics.

There are some who says the classics should be referred.

There are some who says they have based their findings on the thousands of readings they have carried out.

There are some who uses the classics when it suits their style and discard when it does not.

There are some who never read the classics.

There are some who only attend seminar and workshop because they don’t like to read.

Who do you believe?